PURCHASED
|
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless Foundation in 110 |
Retails for $8.99US and $9.99CAN at Walmart.
|
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless Foundation in 110 back of bottle |
|
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless Foundation in 110ingredients |
|
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless Foundation in 110 lids. |
Product:
The coverage is medium to full. It was able to cover most of my redness but my larger freckles and moles are still slightly noticeable through it. The finish is a true matte but it not comply dry or flat looking. I does sadly catch on not just dry patch but dry texture of my skin. Dry patches are usually ones with a hard lifted edge that can flack of with scrubbing or scratch lightly. Dry texture is not noticeable usually on the skin and the fact that this foundation emphasis the areas really sucks.
You can avoid some of this with a dimethicone primer but considering this is dimethicone based product this should not be needed. It's also has a alcohol based drying agent to set the product which might explain this phenomena a bit.
It also dose not contain 7% Octinoxate as a chemical sun block in Canada compared to the US one.
Colour: 110 Is a fair neutral shade that reads a touch warm. It is less peach compared to the
Hydrate + Smooth Foundation in 110
Wear: I got 15 hours wear before I noticed fading without a primer or powder to set it.
Packaging: A simple glass jar with lid.
|
Daylight swatch: 110 heavy and buffed out |
|
Flash swatch: 110 heavy and buffed out |
|
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless Foundation in 110 |
This formula is not forgiving on dry skin much like
NARS All Day Luminous Weightless Foundation, it clings to any textural dryness of the skin that is normally not my dry patches or most where most foundations will not look like it.
The good news is that this is a drug store version of NARS All Day Luminous Weightless Foundations, so if you have normal to oily skin this will be your foundation of choice. It also I think this looks smoother on the skin in comparison as well to NARS.
Just not for me despite this being a better shade match. ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment